CAS Exam 5 Spring 2016, Question 24
Study guide: Exam 5
Given the following information:
Cumulative Reported Claims ($) as of (months):
| Accident Year | 12 | 24 | 36 | 48 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 450 | 650 | 730 | 750 |
| 2012 | 500 | 700 | 780 | |
| 2013 | 500 | 750 | ||
| 2014 | 700 |
| Accident Year | Selected Ultimate Claims ($) | Reported Claims ($) as of December 31, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 750 | 750 |
| 2012 | 1,000 | 950 |
| 2013 | 1,050 | 900 |
| 2014 | 1,200 | 950 |
- There is no development after 48 months.
Part a (1.5 points)
Compare actual reported claim emergence to expected reported claim emergence in calendar year 2015 for accident years 2011 through 2014.
Part b (1.5 points)
When considering actual emergence compared to expected emergence, the actuary can react in one of three ways:
i. Reduce the recommended unpaid claims ii. Leave the recommended unpaid claims at the same expected level iii. Increase the recommended unpaid claims
Identify and briefly justify a reserving technique that would generate each of the three potential reactions using the results of part a. above.
Answer this question and see the worked solution
Concepts tested
- Actual vs Expected Analysis
- Development Factor
- Unpaid Claims
- Chain Ladder Method
- Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method
- Expected Loss Method