Offset Variable
Study guides: Exam MAS-I, Exam PCPA
An Offset Variable is a predictor in a Generalized Linear Model whose coefficient is fixed at exactly 1 rather than estimated from the data — used to force a known, exact relationship (most commonly exposure) into the linear predictor.
g(\mu_i) = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x_{i1} + \cdots + \beta_p x_{ip} + \text{offset}_i
\text{log link, exposure offset:} \quad \ln\mu_i = \ln(\text{Exposure}_i) + \beta_0 + \beta_1 x_{i1} + \cdots + \beta_p x_{ip}
- The offset must be on the same scale as the linear predictor: with a log link it is the logged quantity —
\ln(\text{Exposure}), not exposure. Several offsets are added together after each is transformed - For claim counts
N_i \sim \text{Poi}(\mu_i), sinceE[N_i] = \text{Exposure}_i \times \text{Frequency}_i, including\ln(\text{Exposure}_i)as an offset converts a model for expected claim counts into a model for the underlying claim Frequency rate per unit of exposure - An offset differs from an ordinary Control Variable: its coefficient is not estimated — it is forced to equal
1, consistent with the known proportional relationship between exposure and expected claims - If exposure were instead entered as an ordinary covariate, its estimated coefficient need not equal
1, which would mask the intended exactly-proportional relationship - Offsets are also used to carry forward previously-determined relativities (e.g., an established deductible or territory relativity) into a new model without re-estimating them — again on the linear-predictor scale: under a log link a deductible factor of
0.90enters as\ln 0.90 = -0.1054, and a base loss cost of265with that factor as\ln 265 + \ln 0.90 = 5.4744
Fitting a Poisson Frequency Model with an Exposure Offset A Poisson GLM for claim counts uses
\ln(\text{Exposure})as an offset and a single rating variable, driver age, with fitted equation\ln\hat{\mu}_i = \ln(\text{Exposure}_i) - 2.5 + 0.01 \cdot \text{age}_i. For a driver age 40 with2car-years of exposure, find the expected claim count and the fitted frequency.Answer
\ln\hat{\mu} = \ln(2) - 2.5 + 0.01(40) = 0.693 - 2.5 + 0.4 = -1.407\hat{\mu} = e^{-1.407} \approx 0.245 \text{ expected claims}Since the offset coefficient is fixed at1, dividing back out the exposure gives the fitted frequency:\hat{\mu}/\text{Exposure} = 0.245/2 \approx 0.122claims per car-year.