Actuarial Notes

Time-Reversible Markov Chain

Study guide: Exam MAS-I

A Time-Reversible Markov Chain is an ergodic Markov Chain that, once it is running in its long-run (stationary) regime, behaves the same backward in time as forward. Traced backward, the states X_n, X_{n-1}, X_{n-2}, \ldots of a stationary ergodic chain with transition probabilities P_{ij} and stationary probabilities \pi_i form a Markov chain with transition probabilities Q_{ij}; the chain is time reversible when Q_{ij} = P_{ij} for all i and j.

Q_{ij} = \frac{\pi_j P_{ji}}{\pi_i}

\pi_i P_{ij} = \pi_j P_{ji} \quad \text{for all } i, j

  • The second line — the time-reversibility or detailed balance equations — says that the long-run rate of transitions from i to j, \pi_i P_{ij}, equals the rate from j to i. Every stationary chain balances total flow into and out of each state (\boldsymbol{\pi}\mathbf{P} = \boldsymbol{\pi}); a reversible chain balances it pair by pair.
  • A shortcut to \boldsymbol{\pi}. If nonnegative numbers x_i summing to 1 satisfy x_i P_{ij} = x_j P_{ji} for every pair, then summing over i gives \sum_i x_i P_{ij} = x_j: the chain is time reversible and x_i = \pi_i. When a chain is suspected to be reversible, solving these pairwise equations is usually much easier than solving \boldsymbol{\pi}\mathbf{P} = \boldsymbol{\pi}. For an arbitrary chain, though, they usually have no solution.
  • Chains that move one step at a time are reversible. If a chain can only move to a neighbouring state (i \to i \pm 1, or stay), every move from i to i+1 must be followed by one back before the next, so \pi_i P_{i,i+1} = \pi_{i+1} P_{i+1,i}. A Bonus-Malus System whose levels move one step per year is an example.
  • Kolmogorov's test. A necessary condition is P_{ik} P_{kj} P_{ji} = P_{ij} P_{jk} P_{ki} for all i, j, k; in general an ergodic chain is reversible exactly when every cycle of states has the same probability as the reversed cycle. A pair with P_{ij} > 0 but P_{ji} = 0 rules reversibility out.
  • Random walk on a weighted graph. If from node i the chain moves to j with probability P_{ij} = w_{ij} / \sum_k w_{ik}, where the arc weights are symmetric (w_{ij} = w_{ji}), it is reversible, with \pi_i proportional to the total weight at node i, \sum_j w_{ij}.

Long-Run Mix in a One-Step Bonus-Malus System A motor book has four premium levels, 1 (best) to 4 (worst), with premiums $100, $120, $150 and $200. A policyholder moves down one level after a claim-free year and up one level after a year with a claim, staying put at the ends; each year has a claim with probability 0.2. Find the long-run proportion of policyholders at each level and the long-run average premium.

Answer Moves are one step at a time, so the chain is reversible and each neighbouring pair balances. Moving up needs a claim (0.2), moving down a claim-free year (0.8):

\begin{align*}
\pi_i (0.2) &= \pi_{i+1} (0.8) \\
\pi_{i+1} &= \tfrac14\, \pi_i
\end{align*}

So \boldsymbol{\pi} \propto (1, \tfrac14, \tfrac1{16}, \tfrac1{64}), which sums to \tfrac{85}{64}: \boldsymbol{\pi} = \big(\tfrac{64}{85},\ \tfrac{16}{85},\ \tfrac{4}{85},\ \tfrac{1}{85}\big) = (0.753,\ 0.188,\ 0.047,\ 0.012) The long-run average premium is

\begin{align*}
\sum_i \pi_i b_i &= \frac{64(100) + 16(120) + 4(150) + 1(200)}{85} \\
&= \frac{9{,}120}{85} \\
&= \$107.29
\end{align*}

No system of four balance equations had to be solved — three pairwise ratios and a normalisation were enough.

The Underwriting Cycle Run Backward A reinsurer classes each year's market as Soft (S), Firming (F) or Hard (H): \mathbf{P} = \begin{array}{c|ccc} & S & F & H \\ \hline S & 0.5 & 0.4 & 0.1 \\ F & 0.1 & 0.5 & 0.4 \\ H & 0.4 & 0.1 & 0.5 \end{array} Find the stationary distribution and the reversed-chain transition probabilities Q_{ij}. Is the chain time reversible?

Answer Each column also sums to 1, so the uniform distribution is stationary: \pi_S = \pi_F = \pi_H = \tfrac13. With equal \pi's, Q_{ij} = \pi_j P_{ji} / \pi_i = P_{ji}, so the reversed chain's matrix is the transpose: \mathbf{Q} = \begin{array}{c|ccc} & S & F & H \\ \hline S & 0.5 & 0.1 & 0.4 \\ F & 0.4 & 0.5 & 0.1 \\ H & 0.1 & 0.4 & 0.5 \end{array} \mathbf{Q} \neq \mathbf{P}, so the chain is not reversible. Detailed balance fails at once:

\begin{align*}
\pi_S P_{SF} &= \tfrac13(0.4) \\
&= 0.133 \\
\pi_F P_{FS} &= \tfrac13(0.1) \\
&= 0.033
\end{align*}

Kolmogorov's test shows the same: the cycle S \to F \to H \to S has probability 0.4^3 = 0.064 but the reverse cycle S \to H \to F \to S only 0.1^3 = 0.001. The market turns Soft, Firming, Hard far more often than the other way round, so a film of it run backward would look wrong — even though its long-run mix is a perfectly even one-third each.