Mixing Distribution
Study guide: Exam MAS-I
A Mixing Distribution is the distribution of a model parameter that varies randomly from risk to risk. In a Mixed Poisson Process it is the distribution g(\lambda) of the claim rate \Lambda across the portfolio: each insured has a fixed but unknown rate, and a randomly chosen insured's count distribution is the Poisson averaged over g.
P(N(t) = n) = \int_0^\infty \frac{e^{-\lambda t}(\lambda t)^n}{n!}\, g(\lambda)\, d\lambda
\text{Var}(N(t)) = t\,E[\Lambda] + t^2\,\text{Var}(\Lambda)
- With a discrete mixing distribution (a few risk classes with weights
w_jand rates\lambda_j) the integral becomes a sum,\sum_j w_j\, e^{-\lambda_j t}(\lambda_j t)^n/n!. The mean is alwayst\,E[\Lambda]; the extrat^2\,\text{Var}(\Lambda)in the variance is the between-risk heterogeneity. - Gamma mixing gives the negative binomial. If
\Lambda \simGamma(\alpha, \theta)(shape\alpha, scale\theta), thenN(t)is negative binomial in its failures-count form withr = \alphaandp = 1/(1 + \theta t):
P(N(t) = n) = \frac{\Gamma(n + \alpha)}{n!\,\Gamma(\alpha)}\, p^{\alpha}(1-p)^{n}
- The mixing distribution is the prior. After
nclaims intyears, the gamma rate's posterior is Gamma with shape\alpha + nand scale\theta/(1 + \theta t); its mean equalsZ(n/t) + (1-Z)\alpha\thetawithZ = t/(t + 1/\theta). This is the gamma–Poisson case of Bayesian Credibility, where Bayes and Bühlmann agree (exact credibility). - Mixing is why a policyholder's past predicts its future — the basis of Experience Rating and a Bonus-Malus System. It also costs the process its independent increments (it keeps stationary ones).
- The same device mixes any parameter: an exponential severity whose rate is gamma-distributed is Pareto unconditionally.
Gamma Mixing Across an Auto Portfolio Annual claim rates across a personal auto portfolio are Gamma with
\alpha = 2and\theta = 0.1(mean0.2). For a randomly selected insured, find the probabilities of0and1claims next year, and compare with a\text{Poi}(0.2)model.Answer Here
p = 1/(1 + 0.1) = 10/11:\begin{align*} P(N = 0) &= \left(\tfrac{10}{11}\right)^2 \\ &= 0.8264 \\ P(N = 1) &= \frac{\Gamma(3)}{1!\,\Gamma(2)}\left(\tfrac{10}{11}\right)^2\left(\tfrac{1}{11}\right) \\ &= 0.1503 \end{align*}The Poisson gives
e^{-0.2} = 0.8187and0.2e^{-0.2} = 0.1637. Same mean, but mixing moves probability to zero claims and to the tail: the variance is2(0.1)(1.1) = 0.22against0.20.
Updating One Insured's Rate In the same portfolio, an insured has
3claims in2years. Find the posterior mean of its claim rate.Answer The posterior is Gamma with shape
2 + 3 = 5and scale0.1/(1 + 0.2) = 1/12:\begin{align*} E[\Lambda \mid N(2) = 3] &= \frac{5}{12} \\ &= 0.4167 \end{align*}As a credibility weighting,
Z = 2/(2 + 10) = 1/6on the observed1.5per year and5/6on the prior0.2:0.25 + 0.1667 = 0.4167. The rate estimate more than doubles on two years of data, yet most of the weight stays on the portfolio mean.
Two Risk Classes and a Claim-Free Year
70\%of drivers have rate0.1and30\%have rate0.5. Find the probability that a randomly chosen driver is claim-free for a year, and the probability that a claim-free driver is high-risk.Answer
\begin{align*} P(N = 0) &= 0.7e^{-0.1} + 0.3e^{-0.5} \\ &= 0.63339 + 0.18196 \\ &= 0.81535 \end{align*}\begin{align*} P(\text{high} \mid N = 0) &= \frac{0.18196}{0.81535} \\ &= 0.2232 \end{align*}One clean year lowers the chance the driver is high-risk from
30\%to22\%— the logic a claim-free discount rests on.