Actuarial Notes

Mixing Distribution

Study guide: Exam MAS-I

A Mixing Distribution is the distribution of a model parameter that varies randomly from risk to risk. In a Mixed Poisson Process it is the distribution g(\lambda) of the claim rate \Lambda across the portfolio: each insured has a fixed but unknown rate, and a randomly chosen insured's count distribution is the Poisson averaged over g.

P(N(t) = n) = \int_0^\infty \frac{e^{-\lambda t}(\lambda t)^n}{n!}\, g(\lambda)\, d\lambda

\text{Var}(N(t)) = t\,E[\Lambda] + t^2\,\text{Var}(\Lambda)

  • With a discrete mixing distribution (a few risk classes with weights w_j and rates \lambda_j) the integral becomes a sum, \sum_j w_j\, e^{-\lambda_j t}(\lambda_j t)^n/n!. The mean is always t\,E[\Lambda]; the extra t^2\,\text{Var}(\Lambda) in the variance is the between-risk heterogeneity.
  • Gamma mixing gives the negative binomial. If \Lambda \sim Gamma(\alpha, \theta) (shape \alpha, scale \theta), then N(t) is negative binomial in its failures-count form with r = \alpha and p = 1/(1 + \theta t):

P(N(t) = n) = \frac{\Gamma(n + \alpha)}{n!\,\Gamma(\alpha)}\, p^{\alpha}(1-p)^{n}

  • The mixing distribution is the prior. After n claims in t years, the gamma rate's posterior is Gamma with shape \alpha + n and scale \theta/(1 + \theta t); its mean equals Z(n/t) + (1-Z)\alpha\theta with Z = t/(t + 1/\theta). This is the gamma–Poisson case of Bayesian Credibility, where Bayes and Bühlmann agree (exact credibility).
  • Mixing is why a policyholder's past predicts its future — the basis of Experience Rating and a Bonus-Malus System. It also costs the process its independent increments (it keeps stationary ones).
  • The same device mixes any parameter: an exponential severity whose rate is gamma-distributed is Pareto unconditionally.

Gamma Mixing Across an Auto Portfolio Annual claim rates across a personal auto portfolio are Gamma with \alpha = 2 and \theta = 0.1 (mean 0.2). For a randomly selected insured, find the probabilities of 0 and 1 claims next year, and compare with a \text{Poi}(0.2) model.

Answer Here p = 1/(1 + 0.1) = 10/11:

\begin{align*}
P(N = 0) &= \left(\tfrac{10}{11}\right)^2 \\
&= 0.8264 \\
P(N = 1) &= \frac{\Gamma(3)}{1!\,\Gamma(2)}\left(\tfrac{10}{11}\right)^2\left(\tfrac{1}{11}\right) \\
&= 0.1503
\end{align*}

The Poisson gives e^{-0.2} = 0.8187 and 0.2e^{-0.2} = 0.1637. Same mean, but mixing moves probability to zero claims and to the tail: the variance is 2(0.1)(1.1) = 0.22 against 0.20.

Updating One Insured's Rate In the same portfolio, an insured has 3 claims in 2 years. Find the posterior mean of its claim rate.

Answer The posterior is Gamma with shape 2 + 3 = 5 and scale 0.1/(1 + 0.2) = 1/12:

\begin{align*}
E[\Lambda \mid N(2) = 3] &= \frac{5}{12} \\
&= 0.4167
\end{align*}

As a credibility weighting, Z = 2/(2 + 10) = 1/6 on the observed 1.5 per year and 5/6 on the prior 0.2: 0.25 + 0.1667 = 0.4167. The rate estimate more than doubles on two years of data, yet most of the weight stays on the portfolio mean.

Two Risk Classes and a Claim-Free Year 70\% of drivers have rate 0.1 and 30\% have rate 0.5. Find the probability that a randomly chosen driver is claim-free for a year, and the probability that a claim-free driver is high-risk.

Answer

\begin{align*}
P(N = 0) &= 0.7e^{-0.1} + 0.3e^{-0.5} \\
&= 0.63339 + 0.18196 \\
&= 0.81535
\end{align*}
\begin{align*}
P(\text{high} \mid N = 0) &= \frac{0.18196}{0.81535} \\
&= 0.2232
\end{align*}

One clean year lowers the chance the driver is high-risk from 30\% to 22\% — the logic a claim-free discount rests on.