Actuarial Notes

Confidence Interval

Study guides: Exam SRM, Exam MAS-I

A Confidence Interval is a range computed from a sample that covers the unknown parameter with a stated long-run probability 1 - \alpha. It reports the same information as a hypothesis test but on the parameter's own scale — the interval contains exactly those null values the test would not reject.

\bar{X} \pm z_{\alpha/2}\,\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}} \qquad (\sigma \text{ known})

\bar{X} \pm t_{\alpha/2,\,n-1}\,\frac{S}{\sqrt{n}} \qquad (\sigma \text{ estimated})

  • Both intervals assume a random sample from a normal population. The z interval is then exact, and so is the t interval, because (\bar{X} - \mu)/(S/\sqrt{n}) has a t distribution with n - 1 degrees of freedom. For a non-normal population both are only approximate, through the CLT, and need a larger n the further the population is from normal
  • The general form is \hat\theta \pm (\text{critical value}) \times \text{SE}(\hat\theta), where the critical value comes from the estimator's Sampling Distribution
  • The coverage statement is about the procedure, not one interval: 95\% of intervals built this way contain \theta. Once computed, a given interval either contains \theta or does not
  • Width shrinks like 1/\sqrt{n} and grows with confidence — going from 95\% to 99\% multiplies the half-width by 2.576/1.96 = 1.31
  • Use t_{n-1} whenever \sigma is replaced by S; the extra width is the price of estimating the spread, and it matters most for small n. Here z_{\alpha/2} and t_{\alpha/2,\,n-1} are upper-tail points (area \alpha/2 above them). The CAS MAS-I t table is headed by two-sided tail areas, so t_{\alpha/2,\,n-1} is in the column headed \alpha: t_{0.025,\,15} = 2.131 is under 0.05
  • For a variance, the interval is built from the \\chi^2 distribution, since (n-1)S^2/\sigma^2 \sim \chi^2_{n-1} for a normal sample, and is asymmetric: \left(\frac{(n-1)S^2}{\chi^2_{n-1}(1-\alpha/2)},\ \frac{(n-1)S^2}{\chi^2_{n-1}(\alpha/2)}\right). Here \chi^2_{n-1}(p) is the point with lower-tail area p, which is the CAS MAS-I chi-square table's column p, so the larger point gives the lower endpoint. For n = 16 at 95\% the df 15 row gives \left(\frac{15S^2}{27.49},\ \frac{15S^2}{6.26}\right). This interval needs the normal population at every n: no CLT rescues it
  • For an MLE, the large-sample interval \hat\theta \pm z_{\alpha/2}/\sqrt{n I(\hat\theta)} uses the Fisher Information; for a GLM coefficient it is \hat\beta_j \pm z_{\alpha/2}\text{SE}(\hat\beta_j), and exponentiating both endpoints gives an interval for the multiplicative rating factor

Interval for a Mean with Unknown Variance A sample of n = 16 claims, assumed drawn from a normal population, has \bar{x} = 8{,}400 and s = 1{,}200. Build a 95\% confidence interval for \mu, given t_{0.025, 15} = 2.131.

Answer \text{SE} = \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} = \frac{1{,}200}{4} = 300 8{,}400 \pm 2.131(300) = 8{,}400 \pm 639 = (7{,}761,\ 9{,}039) Because 8{,}000 lies inside the interval, a two-sided test of H_0: \mu = 8{,}000 at \alpha = 0.05 would not reject.

From a Coefficient to a Rating Factor A log-link GLM gives \hat\beta = 0.35 for "urban territory" with \text{SE} = 0.12. Give a 95\% interval for the multiplicative effect on expected claim frequency.

Answer On the linear-predictor scale: 0.35 \pm 1.96(0.12) = (0.115,\ 0.585). Exponentiating the endpoints: \left(e^{0.115},\ e^{0.585}\right) = (1.12,\ 1.80) Urban risks are estimated to have 12\% to 80\% higher frequency. The interval excludes 1.00, so the effect is significant at 5\% — but it is wide enough that the indicated relativity is far from precisely known.