Actuarial Notes

CAS Exam 7 Spring 2017, Question 23

Study guide: Exam 9

A multiline insurance company is considering different reinsurance options. The following table contains the cumulative probability distributions for net premium minus net losses under three scenarios: BARE (no reinsurance), the current reinsurance structure, and the alternative reinsurance structure.

Probability BARE Current Alternative
0.00% -217,911,928 -196,110,272 -154,691,590
0.25% -71,606,742 -53,319,764 -52,785,091
0.50% -50,326,877 -31,517,432 -26,643,103
1.00% -31,241,388 -14,127,673 -11,094,195
2.00% -17,530,205 -5,375,766 -6,715,733
4.00% -8,476,413 -2,672,775 -4,229,923
8.00% -2,252,408 -1,431,366 -2,746,629
10.00% -559,293 -1,084,345 -2,028,415
20.00% 3,431,549 1,100,974 1,980,256
25.00% 4,197,741 1,929,228 2,993,689
50.00% 5,519,858 3,043,212 4,453,299

The following table shows the ceded premium and expected recoveries under each reinsurance structure after reinstatement:

Ceded Premium Expected Recoveries
Current 4,307,000 2,632,000
Alternative 2,700,000 1,676,000

Part a (1.75 points)

Construct a cost/benefit diagram at each of the following return periods:

  • i. 1-in-10 years
  • ii. 1-in-25 years
  • iii. 1-in-100 years
  • iv. 1-in-200 years

Part b (0.75 points)

Recommend a reinsurance structure for the company to implement utilizing the results in part a. above.

Part c (0.25 points)

The model that produced the loss distributions above used a Frank copula for correlating lines of business for clash and accumulation events. Briefly describe a possible improvement to the model.

Answer this question and see the worked solution

Concepts tested

More questions from this set