CAS Exam 5 Spring 2019, Question 7
Study guide: Exam 5
Given the following data as of December 31, 2018:
| Accident Year | Reported Loss and ALAE ($000s) | Calendar Year | Earned Premium ($000s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2,000 | 2016 | 4,600 |
| 2017 | 1,750 | 2017 | 5,100 |
| 2018 | 800 | 2018 | 5,800 |
| Development Age to Ultimate | Selected Cumulative Development Factors |
|---|---|
| 36 | 1.46 |
| 24 | 2.08 |
| 12 | 4.90 |
| 65% | Expected loss and ALAE ratio |
| 4% | Annual loss and ALAE trend |
| 3% | Annual premium trend |
| 6% | Fixed expense ratio |
| 26% | Variable expense ratio |
| 5% | Profit and contingencies provision |
| 8% | ULAE provision as a % of loss and ALAE |
| 0.7 | Credibility of historical experience |
| +8% | Complement of credibility taken from a competitor rate change filing |
Rate change history:
-
-2% Rate change effective January 1, 2016
-
+3% Rate change effective July 1, 2018
-
All policies are annual.
-
Exposures are written evenly throughout each calendar year.
-
New rates will be in effect for one year starting January 1, 2020.
Part a (0.5 points)
Calculate the ultimate loss and ALAE for each accident year using the reported Bornhuetter-Ferguson technique.
Part b (3.5 points)
Calculate the credibility-weighted indicated rate change using the latest three accident years.
Part c (0.75 points)
Briefly describe a disadvantage of using a competitor rate change filing as the complement of credibility and justify a more suitable alternative.
Answer this question and see the worked solution
Concepts tested
- Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method
- Overall Rate Level Indication
- Loss Trend
- On Level Premium
- Complement of Credibility
- Parallelogram Method