Statistical Learning
Study guides: Exam SRM, Exam MAS-II, Exam DISC-DA
Statistical Learning is a framework of methods for modeling the relationship between inputs (predictors \mathbf{X}) and an output (response Y) from data, with the goal of prediction or inference.
Y = f(\mathbf{X}) + \varepsilon
\text{Expected prediction error} = \text{Bias}^2(\hat{f}) + \text{Var}(\hat{f}) + \sigma_\varepsilon^2
Supervised vs. Unsupervised:
- Supervised learning: a labeled response
Yis available (e.g., regression, classification) - Unsupervised learning: no labeled response; the goal is to find structure in
\mathbf{X}(e.g., Clustering, Principal Components Analysis)
Regression vs. Classification (James et al., §2.1.5):
- A problem with a quantitative response (claim severity, pure premium) is a regression problem; one with a qualitative response taking one of
Kclasses (fraud or not, renew or lapse) is a classification problem - The line is not crisp: Logistic Regression classifies a binary response but estimates class probabilities, and K-Nearest Neighbors and boosting handle either kind of response
Prediction vs. Inference:
- Prediction: minimize test error; interpretability may be sacrificed
- Inference: understand which predictors affect
Yand how; interpretability is essential
Bias–Variance Trade-off:
- High bias (underfitting): model too simple, misses true pattern
- High variance (overfitting): model too flexible, fits noise
- Optimal model complexity minimizes total expected prediction error
Methods by exam (CAS 2026 content outlines; both exams read James et al., An Introduction to Statistical Learning):
MAS-I — James Ch 1, 2 (excluding §2.2.3), 3 (§§3.1–3.3), 4 (§§4.1–4.4), 5, 6 and 7:
| Method | James chapter | Task |
|---|---|---|
| Linear Regression | 3 Linear Regression | Regression |
| Logistic Regression, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, Naive Bayes | 4 Classification | Classification |
| Cross-Validation, Bootstrap | 5 Resampling Methods | Estimating test error and standard errors |
| Variable Selection (subset selection), Regularization (ridge, lasso), Principal Components Regression, Partial Least Squares, High-Dimensional Data | 6 Linear Model Selection and Regularization | Regression |
| Polynomial Regression, Step Function, Regression Spline, Smoothing Spline, Local Regression, Generalized Additive Model | 7 Moving Beyond Linearity | Regression (GAMs also classification) |
MAS-II — James Ch 1, §2.2, §4.4.2 (confusion matrix), Ch 8, 10 and 12:
| Method | Type | Task |
|---|---|---|
| K-Nearest Neighbors | Nonparametric | Classification/Regression |
| Decision Tree | Tree-based | Classification/Regression |
| Tree Ensemble | Ensemble | Classification/Regression |
| Principal Components Analysis | Dimensionality reduction | Unsupervised |
| Clustering | K-means / hierarchical | Unsupervised |
| Neural Network | Deep learning | Classification/Regression |
Bias-Variance Trade-off for a Smoothing Spline (MAS-I) A smoothing spline is fitted to the same data once with tuning parameter
\lambda = 0and once with\lambda \to \infty. Which fit has higher bias? Higher variance?Answer
\lambda = 0: the roughness penalty has no effect, so the curve is very jumpy and interpolates every training observation — very flexible, low bias, high variance.\lambda \to \infty: the curve is forced to be perfectly smooth, which makes it the least squares straight line — rigid, high bias, low variance. In between,\lambdasets the trade-off and is chosen by Cross-Validation.
Bias-Variance Trade-off for KNN (MAS-II) A KNN model is fitted with
K=1and separately withK=100for a classification problem. Which has higher bias? Higher variance?Answer
K=1: very flexible — low bias, high variance (each prediction depends only on the single nearest neighbor, so it overfits noise).K=100: very rigid — high bias, low variance (predictions are averaged over many neighbors, smoothing out local patterns but potentially missing fine structure).
How it appears on the exam
- DISC-DA: Section 7.1 covers basic data modeling techniques. Questions describe an insurance problem and ask whether it is supervised or unsupervised, a regression or a classification problem, or a prediction or an inference task, and which kind of technique fits, such as a classification tree for a yes/no outcome or clustering for segments with no target.
- MAS-II and SRM: Questions compare methods on flexibility and interpretability and apply the bias-variance trade-off, as in the examples above.
Exam traps
- "Logistic regression" is a classifier: Its name says regression, but it is used for a qualitative response.
- Unsupervised has no target: If the data include the outcome to be predicted, the task is supervised, even if clustering is used along the way.
- Flexibility is not accuracy: A more flexible method has lower bias but higher variance; on new data it can predict worse than a simpler one.