Actuarial Notes

Profit Commission

Study guide: Exam 9

A Profit Commission is additional commission the reinsurer pays the cedant at the end of a contract period: a stated percentage of the reinsurer's profit on the treaty. Profit is measured as premium less losses, less the ceding commission, less an agreed margin for the reinsurer's expenses. It is paid only when that profit is positive, so the cedant shares the upside and never the downside.

\text{PC} = k \times \max\left(0,\; 1 - \text{LR} - c - m\right)

E[\text{PC}] = k \sum_i p_i \max\left(0,\; 1 - \text{LR}_i - c - m\right)

  • All terms are ratios to ceded premium. k is the share of profit returned, \text{LR} the treaty loss ratio, c the ceding commission and m the reinsurer's margin. p_i is the probability of loss-ratio outcome \text{LR}_i from an aggregate distribution.
  • It is a call option held by the cedant. The payoff is convex, so E[\text{PC}] \ge \text{PC}(E[\text{LR}]), and the gap grows with the loss ratio's volatility. Evaluate it over the distribution (Clark). The plug-in understates what the reinsurer gives away, and gives zero whenever the expected loss ratio exceeds 1 - c - m.
  • It only ever costs the reinsurer. A profit commission never increases the reinsurer's expected margin. To leave that margin unchanged, the base terms must tighten: a lower flat commission, a higher rate, or both. Contrast a sliding scale, which moves the commission both ways within bounds.
  • Carryforward. A deficit (negative profit) in one year is often carried into the next year's calculation. That lowers the expected profit commission, but a single-year pricing view ignores it. Clark notes the same ambiguity in pricing carryforwards as for sliding scales.
  • Profit commissions also appear on excess and catastrophe covers — for example, returning a large share of premium if the contract is loss-free for several years. Heavy profit commissions are a hallmark of Finite Reinsurance and one of the features that can defeat Risk Transfer. See Reinsurance Contract Provisions.

Profit Commission with a Deficit Carryforward A quota share cedes \$8M of premium each year, with a 27.5\% ceding commission. The profit commission is 40\% of profit after a 7.5\% margin, with deficits carried forward. Year 1's loss ratio is 70\% and year 2's is 55\%. Find the profit commission each year, and what year 2's would have been with no carryforward.

Answer Year 1:

\begin{align*}
\text{Profit} &= 100\% - 70\% - 27.5\% - 7.5\% \\
&= -5\%
\end{align*}

No profit commission is paid. The deficit of 0.05 \times \$8\text{M} = \$400{,}000 carries forward.

Year 2:

\begin{align*}
\text{Profit} &= (100 - 55 - 27.5 - 7.5)\% \times \$8\text{M} \\
&= \$800{,}000
\end{align*}
\begin{align*}
\text{PC} &= 0.40 \times (\$800{,}000 - \$400{,}000) \\
&= \$160{,}000
\end{align*}

Without the carryforward it would have been 0.40 \times \$800{,}000 = \$320{,}000. The carryforward halves year 2's payment, so the reinsurer recovers part of year 1's loss before sharing year 2's profit.

Expected Profit Commission Versus the Plug-In A quota share has \$20M of ceded premium, a 25\% ceding commission, and a profit commission of 20\% after a 5\% margin. The treaty loss ratio is 40\% (p = 0.2), 60\% (0.4), 80\% (0.3) or 100\% (0.1). Find the expected profit commission and the reinsurer's expected loss-plus-commission ratio.

Answer

\begin{align*}
E[\text{LR}] &= 0.2(40) + 0.4(60) + 0.3(80) + 0.1(100) \\
&= 66\%
\end{align*}

\text{PC} = 0.20\max(0, 70 - \text{LR}) gives 6, 2, 0, 0 points in the four outcomes.

\begin{align*}
E[\text{PC}] &= 0.2(6) + 0.4(2) \\
&= 2.0\%
\end{align*}

The plug-in gives 0.20(70 - 66) = 0.8\%.

In dollars the expected profit commission is \$400{,}000, against \$160{,}000 by plug-in. The reinsurer's expected ratio is 66 + 25 + 2.0 = 93.0\%, not the 91.8\% the plug-in suggests. The extra 1.2 points come from the good years, when the cedant takes 20\% of a large profit, while the bad years cost the cedant nothing extra.